(And for people who aren’t LDS, it’d be really easy to remove them from the layout.) The LDS ordinances are a lot more compact.I’m using “born” and “died” instead of “birth” and “death” since they’re shorter.For the parents’ parents, I’m including a lifespan to help place things in context (see John Crowder).(If a family has lots of kids, I’m thinking the second page would drop the parent sidebar and go full-width, kind of like in Version B.) This is handy when you’ve got a lot of family group records. At a glance, you can tell which family the record is for.For the purposes of this redesign, I’m assuming you’re doing your data entry on the computer.)Īlso, the visual hierarchy is essentially flat, making it hard to see the names of the people involved. (If you intend to fill it out as a form later, however, then it’s a good thing. And lots of wasted space on information that isn’t present. But this is the general layout of traditional family group records. I should add that they normally don’t look quite this bad - this happens to be printed from the new FamilySearch website, and the print stylesheets need a bit of work. Here are a couple of redesigns I’ve been playing around with (and you can click on the screenshots to get a full PDF of each). Traditional family group records (at least the ones I’m used to) are usually a little ugly, but man, they don’t have to be.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |